بعض الكتب لا يقرأها الا كاتبها وبعض اصدقاءه - هل نريدها؟؟؟!!

[becareman]

بعض الكتب لا يقرأها الا كاتبها وبعض اصدقاءه - هل نريدها
اعزائي الاحباب بعض الكتب يشدنا عنوانها فنعتقد انها بحر من العلوم
ولكن في الحقيقة انها تفتقر لادنى مقومات المرجع العلمي
ما لفت انتباهي اليوم وانا في رحلة بحثي عن بعض الكتب الجديدة في النت وجدت كتابا في الباثوفسيولوجي شدني
اضعت وقتا في تنزيل الكتاب
وكنت على وشك رفعه هنا لكن واثناء بحثي عن صورة الغلاف وجدت بعض التعليقات عن الكتاب
في احد المواقع . فاذهلني ما وصف به الكتاب من ضعف ومن البعض الذين يشيرون الى انهم يعرفون المؤلف نفسه
فقررت ان اقترح عليكم محاولة تقييم الكتب غير المعروفة والجديدة قبل رفعها
لان ضياع زمن فرد منا خير من ضياع ازمنة الجميع
ودمتم لي طيبون

اترككم الان مع بعض التعليقات على ذاك الكتاب
PAPERBACK:
This book has too little information for a med student, even in first or second year. A few areas are relatively well covered, but it's neither basic enough to be used as a learning tool nor detailed enough to be used as a reference. I use it once in a while, but only in conjuction with Harrison's, UptoDate, and other such references. You'll still need to go back to a Pathololgy and a Physiology text to find what you're looking for.
LONE RANGER:
It is hard to locate topics and information in this format. I would pay extra for an easier content locator. The content is complete and informational though. Its an okay purchase.
JMTG:
This book is the benchmark of bad textbooks. I refuse to believe the text ever saw an editor before it went into print; the authors - especially McPhee himself - wouldn't be able to recognize DIDACTICS if it came flying into his face; the text is extremely convulted written, confusing, unstructured, concepts are never connected, void of clarity, and in many instances just straight out wrong or self-contradictory; the book has no intention of actually conveying knowledge, instead it keeps digging into itself.

Also, do not believe the other reviewers who give this book 5 stars, they are not actual persons, but agencies paid by the publishers. Or, as I cannot actually attest to that, suffice to say anyone taking medical didactics seriously simply cannot reward this book 5 stars.

WHAT was that book ???

images (21).jpg

[mohammad karrar]

i have read the 7th edition .. seem to be rewritten or revised .. those are considered doctors from well-known universities .. but the nature of the book could be mimic .. being not a textbook of pathphysiology but just an introduction to clinical medicine by emphasizing the mechanisms behind some important signs and symptoms .. it is pointed for undergraduate student from a respected series (LANGE) .. really it helped me as i use it as what written for .. i am still searching for a reliable pathophysiology text most of them are very poor in informations